When goods are delivered to a professional storage operator (“Warehouseman”) for safe keeping or storage, it is usual practice that the parties will enter into express terms which often contain a right of lien in favour of the Warehouseman. The benefit of having an express right of lien is that the terms are clear and unequivocal, especially those relating to enforcement of the lien and sale of the assets.

The Court of Appeal, in the case of Grant & Another v Baker & Another [2016] EWCH 1782 (Ch), has held that a judge had been wrong to postpone an order for possession and sale of a matrimonial home indefinitely due to the postponement being incompatible with the underlying purpose of bankruptcy legislation.

Background